What information co-parents should share about their child

Shared parenting works best when both parents are working from the same information. Here is what that means in practice and how to keep it current.

When a family separates into two households, information about a child’s life does not automatically travel between them. One parent knows what the teacher said at the last parents evening. The other does not. One parent has updated the doctor’s contact details. The other still has the old number. One parent knows the child has been anxious about something at school. The other has no idea.

These gaps are not usually anyone’s fault. They are a structural problem with living in two households rather than one, and they are predictable from the moment a separation happens. What varies is whether parents address them deliberately or leave them to cause friction.

The parents who manage shared information well do not necessarily communicate better than others. They just have a clear, agreed picture of what both parents need to know and a reliable way of keeping it current.


Why shared information matters more than it seems

Information gaps in co-parenting tend to show up in three ways.

The first is practical failure. A parent takes a child to an appointment without knowing about a medication change. A child asks a question that one parent cannot answer because they were not told what happened. A school sends a message to one parent that the other never sees.

The second is conflict. One parent feels excluded from the child’s life. The other feels they are always the one managing everything. Both have a version of events that does not include the full picture, and when those versions collide, the disagreement is harder to resolve than it would be if both parents were working from the same information.

The third is a child who learns to manage the gap themselves. Older children in particular become skilled at navigating between two households that do not share information. That skill has costs: it puts responsibility on a child that belongs with the adults, and it gives the child a degree of control over what each parent knows that is not always in anyone’s interest.


The core information both parents need

Some information is foundational. Both parents need it, it changes infrequently, and it should be documented somewhere both can access rather than exchanged in pieces as the need arises.

Medical. The child’s GP and any specialists they see. Current medications, dosage, and schedule. Known allergies and what the reaction looks like. Any ongoing conditions and how they are being managed. Vaccination history if relevant to travel or activities.

School. The school’s name, address, and main contact number. The class teacher’s name and the best way to reach them. The school’s term dates and any key dates like parents evenings, performances, or trips. Any support the child receives, a learning plan, pastoral involvement, or anything the school has flagged.

Emergency contacts. People who can be contacted if a parent is unreachable: grandparents, other family members, close friends the child knows. Both parents should have the same list and it should be current.

The child’s routine. Bedtimes, meal preferences, any sensory or behavioural patterns that affect how the child settles. Things that help them, things that do not. This matters particularly for younger children where routine provides security, and for children with additional needs where consistency across households makes a real difference.

Regular commitments. Clubs, activities, lessons, and their schedules. Who the key contacts are, what kit or equipment is needed, and any upcoming events or competitions. A child whose parents both know and support their commitments feels more secure than one who has to explain their own schedule to each parent separately.

A regular parenting schedule belongs in the same shared information set. If the arrangement is still being agreed, the free custody schedule generator can produce a simple month-by-month calendar both parents can refer to.


The information that needs to flow regularly

Beyond the foundational layer, there is information that needs to move between households on a more regular basis.

School communications. Letters, emails, newsletters, and anything requiring a response or decision. Both parents being on the school’s contact list helps, but in practice one parent often receives things the other does not. A simple habit of forwarding anything relevant removes the information gap without requiring a complicated system.

Health updates. If the child has been unwell, seen a doctor, or had a change to medication during one parent’s time, the other parent needs to know before the child returns to them. A brief message covering what happened, what was done, and anything to watch for is usually enough.

Anything the child has said or is worried about. Not as a surveillance exercise and not in a way that puts the child in the middle, but significant things a child shares with one parent that affect how they are doing overall. A child who tells one parent they are being bullied at school, or that they are anxious about something, needs both parents to know, not just one.

Upcoming events and appointments. Both parents should know what is coming up in the child’s life, whether or not it falls during their own time. A performance, a birthday party, a medical appointment: these things belong to the child’s whole life, not just to the parent who happens to have them that week.


How to organise it

The format matters less than the consistency. What tends to work is a single, agreed place where foundational information is stored and both parents can access it, combined with a clear channel for the regular flow of updates.

A shared document works for the static information: medical details, school contacts, emergency numbers, routine. It does not need to be elaborate. A single page that both parents can see and edit, reviewed and updated a couple of times a year, is enough.

For regular updates, the same channel you use for co-parenting communication generally works. The habit of including relevant information about the child in the natural flow of co-parenting messages, rather than treating it as a separate category, keeps both parents reasonably informed without requiring a formal system.

What does not work well is relying on the child to carry information between households. Children forget, misremember, and, as they get older, edit what they pass on. Information that matters should travel between adults directly.


When information sharing becomes a point of conflict

In some co-parenting relationships, information is withheld rather than shared, deliberately or as a byproduct of poor communication. One parent is not told about school meetings. Medical decisions are made without consultation. The child’s routine in the other household is a mystery.

When this is happening, it is worth naming it directly with your co-parent before assuming the worst. Sometimes the gap is genuinely about poor communication rather than exclusion, and a clear request for a specific type of information is enough to change the pattern.

If the gap is deliberate and it is affecting the child, it is the kind of issue that belongs in any mediation or legal process that is already underway. A parent who is consistently excluded from decisions and information about their child’s education, health, or welfare has grounds to raise that formally. Courts take seriously the principle that both parents should be able to participate in their child’s life, and excluding one parent from basic information is inconsistent with that principle.

Keep a note of what you have asked for and what response you received, or did not receive. A pattern of requests that were ignored or refused is a clear record of what has been happening and is more useful than a general account of feeling shut out.

Brief description for accessibility

The child’s experience of it

Children in shared care arrangements notice whether their parents are working together or around each other. When both parents know what is happening in their life, the child does not have to manage the gap. They do not have to remember what each parent knows and does not know. They do not have to decide what to share and what to hold back.

That simplicity is worth quite a lot. It allows a child to just be a child in both households rather than a messenger between two separate worlds.


This post is general guidance for co-parents managing shared arrangements. If information sharing has become a formal point of dispute in legal proceedings, speak to a qualified family solicitor or attorney about your situation.

Get in while it's free.

Available on iPhone. No card required.

Download on the App Store Download on the App Store