How to represent yourself in family court
Representing yourself in family court is increasingly common. Here is what it involves, what courts expect, and how to give yourself the best chance.
Representing yourself in family court, known as being a litigant in person in England and Wales and self-represented in the US, is now common rather than exceptional. The cost of legal representation puts it out of reach for many parents, and courts have had to adapt to deal with a significant proportion of cases where one or both parties are unrepresented.
This is not ideal from the court’s perspective, but it is a reality judges work with every day. If you are going into family court without a solicitor or attorney, understanding what to expect and how to prepare makes a real difference to how things go.
What courts expect from unrepresented parents
The first thing worth knowing is that courts do not expect you to know the law. Judges in family proceedings make significant allowances for litigants in person. They will often explain procedure as it happens, give you more time to find documents, and ask questions to help draw out your position rather than expecting you to present it as a trained advocate would.
What courts do expect is that you come prepared, that you engage with the process seriously, and that you focus on the welfare of your child rather than on the conflict with the other parent. A parent who is clearly disorganised, who raises irrelevant issues repeatedly, or who treats every hearing as an opportunity to relitigate the relationship, tests the court’s patience in ways that do not help their case.
Being unrepresented is not an excuse for being unprepared. It is a reason to prepare more carefully than you might otherwise.
Before your first hearing
The preparation you do before each hearing matters more than what you say in the room.
Know what you are asking for. Before any hearing, be clear in your own mind about the specific outcome you want. Where do you want your child to live? What contact arrangement are you proposing? What is your position on the specific issue before the court at this hearing? Vague requests produce vague outcomes.
Understand what the hearing is for. Family proceedings involve multiple hearing types at different stages, and what is appropriate at each one varies. A first hearing is not the moment to present your full case. A dispute resolution appointment is focused on whether agreement is possible. A final hearing is where evidence is given and cross-examination happens. Knowing which stage you are at shapes what you say and how you say it.
Organise your documents. Any documents you intend to rely on should be organised chronologically, paginated, and clearly labelled. Courts deal in paper, and a disorganised bundle of documents makes it harder for the judge to follow your case and harder for you to find things when you need them.
Prepare a short, clear statement of your position. Not a lengthy account of everything that has happened, but a focused summary of what you are asking for and the key reasons why it is in your child’s interests. One page if possible. Two at most for a directions hearing.
In the courtroom
Courts are less formal than most people expect, particularly in family proceedings. There is no jury. The atmosphere is usually closer to a formal meeting than a courtroom drama. Judges in family cases are focused on getting to the relevant information as efficiently as possible.
Address the judge correctly. In England and Wales, a district judge is addressed as Sir or Madam. A circuit judge as Your Honour. In the US this varies by state but Your Honor is standard across most jurisdictions. If you are unsure, asking the court clerk beforehand is completely acceptable.
Speak to the judge, not to the other parent. Everything you say in the hearing is directed to the judge. Even if you are responding to something the other parent said, address your response to the bench. This keeps the tone professional and prevents exchanges from becoming arguments between parties.
Stick to what is relevant. The most common mistake unrepresented parents make is trying to tell the whole story of the relationship. Courts are not interested in why the relationship ended, who behaved worse during the separation, or the full history of grievances between parents. They are interested in the child’s current circumstances and what arrangements would best serve the child going forward. Every time you stray from that focus, you lose the court’s attention.
Take your time. You are allowed to pause, to refer to your notes, and to ask for clarification if you do not understand something. You do not need to speak quickly or fill every silence.
Presenting your evidence
In family proceedings, evidence tends to come in the form of written statements, documents, and occasionally witness evidence at final hearings.
Your witness statement is your main opportunity to set out your position in detail. It should be factual, specific, and focused on the child’s welfare. Each point should be something you can support: with a document, a date, a communication record, or something you directly witnessed or experienced.
Avoid character attacks on the other parent. Courts are experienced at filtering these out and they tend to harm the credibility of the parent making them rather than damaging the person they are aimed at. State what happened, when, and what effect it had on the child. That is more persuasive than any characterisation of the other parent’s personality.
Documents you rely on should be clearly referenced in your statement. A record of missed visits, a log of significant communications, evidence of the child’s school attendance or medical history: anything specific and dated is stronger than anything general and impressionistic.
Cross-examining the other parent and being cross-examined
At a final hearing, both parties give evidence and can ask questions of the other. This is one of the more difficult aspects of being unrepresented.
When cross-examining the other parent, prepare specific questions in advance. Not speeches or statements disguised as questions, but genuine questions directed at specific points you want to establish or challenge. Keep them focused and keep them coming back to the child’s welfare.
When being cross-examined yourself, answer the question that was asked. Not the question you wish had been asked. Not a longer version that allows you to add material the other side does not want the court to hear. Just the question. If a question is misleading or based on a false premise, say so briefly and explain why, then answer it.
In England and Wales, if there are allegations of domestic abuse, there are rules that prevent the alleged perpetrator from directly cross-examining the alleged victim. The court must make alternative arrangements in those cases, so if this applies to your situation, raise it with the court before the final hearing.
Getting help without full representation
Being unrepresented does not mean going in completely alone. Several options exist that fall short of full legal representation but provide meaningful support.
McKenzie friend. In England and Wales, you are allowed to bring a McKenzie friend to court: someone who sits beside you, takes notes, and advises quietly. They cannot speak for you in court but they can help you stay organised and focused. This can be a legally trained person or a trusted individual.
Legal advice sessions. Many solicitors offer fixed-fee advice sessions, an hour or two to review your documents and advise on your position, without taking on the full case. This is significantly cheaper than full representation and can be invaluable before a significant hearing.
Free legal resources. In England and Wales, Cafcass has guidance for unrepresented parents. Citizens Advice and law centres can provide information, if not representation. In the US, many state courts have self-help centers specifically for family law litigants in person.
Direct access barristers. In England and Wales, barristers can now be instructed directly by members of the public for specific hearings, without going through a solicitor. This can be more affordable than full solicitor and barrister representation and gives you an advocate in the room for the hearings that matter most.
Your records matter more when you are unrepresented
When you have a solicitor, part of their job is to organise the evidence, identify what is relevant, and present it coherently. When you are representing yourself, all of that falls to you.
This means the records you have been keeping throughout the proceedings are not just background material. They are the substance of your case. A clear, dated log of significant events, relevant communications, and anything directly affecting your child’s welfare gives you something to work with. A general impression of how things have been is much harder to translate into a persuasive case.
Go into every hearing knowing exactly what you want to establish, what evidence supports it, and where that evidence is in your documents. That preparation is what separates unrepresented parents who are taken seriously from those who are not.
Speak to a family attorney or solicitor before any significant hearing if at all possible, even for a single advice session. The above is general information only and does not constitute legal advice.
Get in while it's free.
Available on iPhone and Android. No card required.
