What to do when your co-parent talks badly about you to your children
Finding out the other parent is speaking negatively about you to your children is painful and damaging. Here is what to do and what not to do.
Finding out that your co-parent has been speaking negatively about you to your children is one of the more painful experiences in shared parenting. It is painful because of what it does to your relationship with your children. It is painful because you cannot control it. And it is painful because the wrong response can make the situation worse rather than better.
This post covers what tends to help, what tends to backfire, and what matters in terms of records if the situation escalates.
What it looks like in practice
Negative talk about one parent to children takes many forms, and not all of them are obvious.
At the clearer end: a parent telling a child directly that the other parent is dishonest, irresponsible, or does not love them. Sharing details of legal disputes or financial arguments with children. Making comments designed to make the child feel afraid or uncertain about time with the other parent.
At the subtler end: sighing or making dismissive sounds when the other parent is mentioned. Asking leading questions that invite the child to criticise. Using the child’s words against the other parent. Responding to positive things the child says about their time with the other parent with silence or visible displeasure.
Children register all of these, even the subtle ones. They may not have words for what they are picking up, but they feel the pressure to manage the emotional reaction of the parent they are with.
Why responding in kind makes things worse
The instinct when you find out this is happening is to correct the record. To tell your children what is actually true. To respond to what has been said with your own version of events.
This is understandable and it is almost always a mistake.
When a child hears both parents speaking critically about each other, they are placed in the position of having to decide who to believe or to carry the weight of both parents’ versions of reality simultaneously. This creates a loyalty conflict that is harmful regardless of which parent is objectively more accurate.
The child who asks you about something the other parent said is not necessarily asking you to confirm or deny it. They may be testing whether you will put them in the middle. They may be looking for reassurance that things are okay. They may be processing something they did not understand.
What they are almost never asking for is a detailed account of the other parent’s failings.
What to say instead
When a child reports something negative the other parent has said, a short, calm, neutral response is almost always better than a detailed one.
“That sounds like it was confusing to hear. You don’t need to worry about that.” Or: “Grown-up stuff is for grown-ups to sort out. You don’t need to be involved in that.” Or simply: “I love you and that isn’t something you need to think about.”
These responses do not confirm the other parent’s account. They do not deny it in a way that invites further discussion. They acknowledge the child’s experience and redirect without engaging with the adult conflict.
As children get older and ask more direct questions, slightly more direct answers become appropriate. A teenager who asks why one parent said something specific deserves a honest but measured response that does not use them as an audience for adult grievance. “Things between your dad and me have been difficult sometimes, but that is between us, not something you need to be in the middle of” is an honest response that does not escalate.
What this is doing to your child
Understanding what is happening to your child helps keep the focus in the right place when your own feelings about the situation are strong.
Children who are consistently exposed to one parent speaking negatively about the other tend to experience increased anxiety, difficulties with loyalty and attachment, and confusion about their own perceptions and feelings. They may become reluctant to share positive experiences from one household with the other parent, because they have learned that doing so creates tension. They may begin to mirror the negative parent’s language without fully understanding what they are repeating.
The impact is not about the individual comments. It is about the cumulative effect of being placed in the middle of adult conflict over time.
Knowing this helps frame your own response. Your priority is protecting your child from that impact, not winning the argument about what has been said.
Do not interrogate your child
When you suspect this is happening, it is natural to want to know more. To ask questions. To understand exactly what has been said and how often.
Asking a child to report on the other parent’s household is itself placing them in a difficult position. Even questions asked with good intentions, “Did Dad say anything about me this weekend?”, put the child in the role of informant and create the same loyalty pressure you are trying to avoid.
If your child volunteers something, note it. If they seem distressed by something connected to the other household, address the distress rather than the source. Create space for them to talk without creating an expectation that they will report.
Keep a record of what your child tells you
This is where the practical and the protective converge.
When a child says something that reflects what has clearly been said to them by the other parent, note it. Write it down shortly after it happened, in the child’s own words as closely as you can recall, with the date and context. Not a dramatised account of how it made you feel, but a factual note of what the child said, when, and what the surrounding circumstances were.
This record matters for two reasons.
The first is practical accuracy. If you are relying on memory of what your child said three months ago, the specific words and context will have blurred. A note made at the time is a more reliable account.
The second is relevance. If the situation reaches a point where a professional, whether a family therapist, a mediator, or a court, needs to understand the pattern of what has been happening, a dated log of specific incidents is far more useful than a general account. Courts and professionals dealing with this kind of situation are looking for documented patterns over time, not a summary of how bad things have been.
Do not show your child the record or involve them in creating it. It exists to protect them and to support you, not to give them another layer of the adult situation to manage.
When to raise it formally
Not every instance of negative talk warrants a formal response. A co-parent who occasionally vents frustration in front of the child is different from one who is engaged in a sustained pattern of behaviour designed to damage the child’s relationship with you.
If the pattern is clear and documented, and if it is visibly affecting the child, there are escalating steps available.
A direct message to the co-parent, calm and specific, naming what the child reported and asking them not to discuss adult matters with the child, is worth doing once. It creates a record that the issue was raised and gives the other parent an opportunity to address it.
If that does not change things, mediation can address co-parenting communication specifically, including what each parent discusses with the child. A mediator can help establish agreed ground rules that both parents commit to.
If the behaviour is serious enough and sustained enough to meet the threshold for affecting the child’s welfare, it becomes relevant to any legal proceedings that are underway or that may follow. Your record of specific incidents, made at the time, is what transforms a concern into something a professional can evaluate.
Your own conduct is part of the record too
Throughout this, how you speak about the other parent to your child is also part of the picture. Courts, therapists, and mediators will be looking at both parents.
This is not about performing virtue. It is about recognising that the most effective thing you can do for your child, and for your own position, is to be the parent who did not put them in the middle. That track record, built consistently over time, is one of the most significant things in your favour if things ever reach a formal stage.
This post is general guidance. If you believe negative talk about you is seriously affecting your child’s welfare, speak to a family therapist about support for your child, and a qualified family attorney or solicitor about your legal options.
Get in while it's free.
Available on iPhone and Android. No card required.
